Search for: "*williams v. Exxon Shipping Co" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 9:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Klass (University of Minnesota Law School) has posted Punitive Damages after Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:11 am
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to expand the time allowed for oral argument in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:47 pm
Williams means and how that issue has played out in the courts since the decision.Review of what Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
For instance, in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:20 pm
In its decision this week in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:14 pm
In that ruling, the Court did not discuss the issue of whether those who sued Exxon Shipping Co. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The appeal is Exxon Shipping Co., et al., v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:27 pm
But given that punitive damages are rarely awarded, and when they are awarded they rarely exceed the amount of compensatory damages (see footnotes 14 & 15 in Exxon Shipping Co.), the defendants played the right odds in seeking a retrial. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
”The Court then elaborated on the one-to-one ratio in a non-constitutional case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]