Search for: " Hall v. Jones" Results 161 - 180 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm by NL
The landlord also argued that the Recorder has been wrong on the principles of negligence, but in the alternative resisted the builder’s second argument on apportionment of liability.The argument on liability was based on the way the recorder had summed up the statement of principle in Whippey v Jones [2009] EWCA Civ 452. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm by NL
The landlord also argued that the Recorder has been wrong on the principles of negligence, but in the alternative resisted the builder’s second argument on apportionment of liability.The argument on liability was based on the way the recorder had summed up the statement of principle in Whippey v Jones [2009] EWCA Civ 452. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:19 am by Bruce E. Boyden
There only a handful of cases from the 1920s through the 1940s, most of which are the “dance hall cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:08 am by New Books Script
KF 311 H67 2011 Outcomes-focused regulation / Andrew Hopper and Gregory Treverton-Jones. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am by Paul Levy
  Back in the 1990's, Ellis Boal, one of the pioneers of union democracy litigation when he was the original lead counsel for Teamsters for a Democratic Union, persuaded a court to rule in Clark v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am by Cormac Early
Coverage of Monday’s decision in Hall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Mr Jones has offered the undertaking. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm by Maritime Blogger
-flagged M/V Delta Mariner that struck a western Kentucky bridge in January, the AP reports. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
  Quoting Lord Irvine LC in DPP v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240, Lindbolm J noted that unless the law is that assembly on the public highway may be lawful the right contained in article 11(1) is denied. [read post]