Search for: " Wilson v. Dollar General Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  While a plaintiff with dollar signs in his/her eyes will typically testify to whatever is necessary to establish warning causation (“Oh, yes, if I had only known about that risk, I would have rejected my oncologist’s recommendation and never taken the drug. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
More generally, this decision underscores that courts in New York are generally reluctant to apply the "intent" or "spirit" behind a contract provision but instead apply the literal terms of the contract. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Richard Hunt
“not every impairment will constitute a disability,” I have included this quote from Wilson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
Sapphire sought to recover millions of dollars for water damage, increased construction costs, delay costs, lost revenue, and other losses that the builder's risk policy allegedly covered or should have covered but the permanent policy did not. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Sapphire sought to recover millions of dollars for water damage, increased construction costs, delay costs, lost revenue, and other losses that the builder's risk policy allegedly covered or should have covered but the permanent policy did not. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
In awarding the judgment for Mark Landsberg Consulting in its suit against Terral Corp., Manhattan Civil Court Judge Arthur F. [read post]