Search for: "11th Judicial District Court" Results 101 - 120 of 1,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Despite holding that district courts must approve the settlement, the court expressed no opinion regarding “what the district court must consider in deciding whether to approve the putative settlement. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am by Joe Mullin
That case is headed back to district court for further proceedings, after EFF and PRO scored a win this summer when an appeals court ordered the district court to re-consider the issue of fair use. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Section 1653(b) of the DBA states: “Judicial proceedings provided under sections 18 and 21 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act in respect to a compensation order made pursuant to this Act shall be instituted in the United States district court of the judicial district wherein is located the office of the deputy commissioner whose compensation order is involved if his office is located in a… [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:31 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, asserting CAFA as the basis of federal jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:06 pm by nflatow
District Court Judge Roger Vinson, but Chief Judge Joel Dubina and Judge Frank Hull did not agree with Vinson that the entire law should be invalidated, Politico reports. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am by Jordan Bublick
Dean that "appellate courts generally will not consider an issue or theory that was not raised in the district court. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:14 am by Ken Lammers
If the General Assembly is going to replace anyone, it doesn't need to replace Justices before it replaces trial judges in the 11th juvenile court district and the 30th circuit court.The Virginia Lawyers Weekly reports that the Senate has fully funded all the empty judicial slots and the House has not funded a single empty judicial slot (not sure if that includes Justices). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The federal district court, however, refused to accept the stipulation as submitted, concluding that Cheeks could not agree to a private settlement of his FLSA claims without either the approval of the district court or the supervision of the United Stated Department of Labor [DOL].The US Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the district court's holding ruling that in the absence of such approval, parties cannot settle their FLSA… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by David Markus
At the same time, the Supreme Court has admonished federal judges that, “[e]ven in the context of federal habeas, deference does not imply abandonment or abdication of judicial review. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 3:27 am by SHG
They elected Andrew Warren as state’s attorney for the Thirteenth Judicial District. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:56 am by Anthony De Yurre
City of Miami, Circuit Court, 11th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Miami-Dade County (Case No. 18-000032-AP-01) [26 Fla. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
Circuit Courts, 11th Judicial District Group 9 This one is pretty easy although candidate Bloch hasn’t helped matters. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am by Michael Froomkin
Circuit Courts, 11th Judicial District Group 9 This one is pretty easy although candidate Bloch hasn’t helped matters. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
So yay for my own 11th Circuit.Here's what the Court directed the district court to do on remand:On remand, the district court must evaluate the four business reasons offered by the County and determine whether the County used prior salary “reasonably in light of [its] stated purpose[s] as well as its other practices. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:43 am by Anthony De Yurre and Jennifer E. Fine
Miami-Dade County, Case No. 17-082 AP, the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County held: (i) the applicant successfully carried its burden in a quasi-judicial hearing before the zoning appeals board of Miami-Dade County (the “County”); and, (ii) that the opposition failed to establish the required “competent, substantial evidence” to deny the application. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:00 pm
The district court concluded that this constituted trademark infringement, a determination that the 11th Circuit upholds here. [read post]