Search for: "A & F Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:57 pm
Cir. 2007));C & F Packing Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:29 pm
B&B Pools Service and Supply Co., ---F.3d ---, 2007 WL 2141375 (6th Cir. 2007), the Plaintiff, Tiseo Architects, were engaged by B&B Pools to design a site plan for an expansion project. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals (No. 21-113). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 402 & fn. 11; Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:30 pm
However, such arguments are more appropriate for a Hearing before a Village Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance under a practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship grounds. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
” (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Ackerman, Ackerman & Dynkowski I. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Gantner v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The court of appeals ruled that the condemnation could proceed based only upon the zoning of the condemnor’s property. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]