Search for: "A B C Insurance Co"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 6:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Co., 2016 NY Slip Op 04658, Court of AppealsIn this action brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Reparations Act [Insurance Law §5101, et seq. -- the "No-Fault" Law] Aetna Health Plans alleged that it paid certain bills that should have been paid by Hanover Insurance Company, the no-fault insurer involved in this action, that were submitted to Aetna by the medical providers. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:28 am
Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
United Drug Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
This decision is significant for insurers faced with opposing class certification under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
§1962(c) of the RICO Act, the court ruled. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
(b) Release of tortfeasor. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 6:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:45 am
Law § 3420(c)(2)(B). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
R & R Sails Inc. d/b/a Hobie Cat Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:17 pm
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. [2007] B.C.J. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:50 am
§2510.3-3(b) and (c) (every ERISA plan must cover at least one common law employee). [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
The insurance company C. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Ct., Kings Co., decided 10/16/2008)There's a lot in here, so be sure to read this decision if you're on the property side of the P&C equation.Jeweler's (or "jeweller's" if you're across the pond) block insurance is all-risk specialized insurance coverage for jewelers. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:24 pm
Co., 33 N.Y. 429, 437 (1865); Eisenberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:28 am
Co. of N.Y. (6 AD3d 484, 486-487), this Court held that a failure to comply with 11 NYCRR 216.6(c) does not preclude an insurance company from relying on a policy exclusion to disclaim coverage. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
The District Court held that the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
(For example: If Person A and B are alive, they get 30% each and person C gets 40%, but if A or B is not alive, then person C gets their share.)If you don't want to let the beneficiary of your policy have immediate access to the money upon your death. [read post]