Search for: "A. v. Oxford Health Insurance" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
The Global Health and Human Rights Database has English summaries of judgments by country. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The case concerned a medical service provider (MDK) who had processed the personal health data of an incapacitated employee and passed the information to a health insurance fund. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Does the Commerce Clause permit Congress to require people to purchase health insurance? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 24 March 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Hayden v Family Education Trust. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
With respect to social security, federal government projections tell us by 2033—a scant nine years away—the reserves in the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (social security) Trust Fund (hereafter, Trust Fund) will be depleted and the continuing program income (FICA taxes) will be sufficient to pay only 77 percent of scheduled benefits.[1]  That’s a big 23% hole that people will desperately want filled. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In the former, the Chief Justice voted to sustain a key provision of the Act as a valid exercise of Congress’s power to tax; in the latter, he voted to permit the provision of subsidies for the purpose of purchasing health insurance on federally operated exchanges. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
" Swift J, Cleghorn v Oldham [1927] 43 TLR 465Some would say that sport is a reflection of life itself. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
In 2013, he supported the retail chain Hobby Lobby in the company’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that employers provide their female employees with health insurance that includes access to certain forms of birth control; by a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court upheld the full 10th Circuit’s ruling for the company. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]