Search for: "AB v. Continental Imports"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 3:22 am
La création de la zone du plateau continental étendu par le nouveau droit de la mer opère un bouleversement important dans l’équilibre du régime juridique du plateau continental. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:04 am
Franssons Verkstäder AB, No. 30 ff.). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F. 3d 257, 263–264 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing cases); Wells v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
at 46.While Brown did not close the door for all consent arguments under all statutes, “at least in cases brought by state residents,” it provides a roadmap for defeating post-Bauman jurisdiction by consent arguments in other states where the registration statute does not conclusively reach that result.Particularly in light of Brown – but we were obviously working on this anyway − we’ve decided that Bauman is important enough to create a new general… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
Gregor Christandl, Juristische Methodenlehre in Italien oder: Kurze Geschichte der italienischen Zivilrechtswissenschaft ab dem 19. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:39 am
Continental Airlines,[10] the minimum contacts test was applied along with the effects test to assess “proper jurisdiction”. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm
Ltd. v Nordwind(1987) 4 NWLR (Pt.66) 520 where the Supreme Court imported this idea relying on The Fehmarn[1957] 1 W.L.R. 815. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 12:23 am
In this context, it seriously restricted the scope of the sui generis protection in 2004 when admitting that the investments in the creation of the database’s contents cannot count as investment for the obtaining of the contents for the purposes of the award of database sui generis right in a series of sport’s database cases (Judgments of the Court in Cases C-46/02, C-203/02, C-338/02 and C-444/02, The British Horseracing Board Ltd and Others v William Hill Organisation… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
