Search for: "ACT v. Hardwick" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2003, 7:21 am
As I thought about the recent Eldred case, which refused to hold the Copyright Term Extension Act unconstitutional, I was struck by the similarities to Bowers v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:57 am by sally
“In the recent decision in Taylor v Betterment Properties Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 250, the Court of Appeal has provided useful guidance on two questions arising under the Commons Registration Act 1965 and potentially of wider implication.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 2nd May 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The term “race” includes ethnicity for purposes of 42 USC 1981 and Title VIIVillage of Freeport and Andrew Hardwick v Barrella, USCA, Second Circuit, No. 14-2270-cv (L) et. al.Christopher Barrella sued the Village of Freeport and its former mayor, Andrew Hardwick, [Hardwick] alleging Hardwick violated 42 USC 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC 2000e, and the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:57 am by sally
Chris Camp considers employment status in discrimination law, in light, in particular, of the recent Supreme Court decision in Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40.” Full story Hardwicke Chambers, 5th July 2012 Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:01 pm by Kate Howard
Hardwick 15-1379 Issue: (1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit may reject the state court’s findings of fact under Anderson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:18 am by NL
[Edit: confirmed by Hardwicke Chambers as being Court of Appeal, permission by Rimer LJ] What is at issue is whether a suspended possession order should be made when the rent arrears have been included in a debt relief order pursuant to the Insolvency Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act), and Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 8:14 am
When the Court rejected what it described as the right of “homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy” in Bowers v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 8:14 am by Christine Corcos
When the Court rejected what it described as the right of “homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy” in Bowers v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:40 am
Hardwick, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion has conclusively put the sex back into homosexual. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by NL
Henson v Blackwood & Blackwood. [read post]