Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The new year sees the issue of yet another UK court case applying the doctrine of equivalents as established by the UK Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) ("Actavis"). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
The judgment covers all dosage levels of the Actavis generic product. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
District of Delaware held that Actavis’ generic version of Orexo’s opioid dependency treatment infringed an Orexo patent. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:09 am
The Actavis ./. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In the UK, the Supreme Court in 2017 released its decision in Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co [2017] UKSC 48 which allowed for variants in claim construction. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
IPKat's summary of the Supreme Court decision (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56) can be found here. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
’ Equivalents Number 10 on the list is the article Actavis and Equivalents – One Year On. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 6:30 am
Sara MoranApplying the so-called ‘Actavis Questions’ (further to the Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly), the Court of Appeal reached a different conclusion from the Patents Court on the issue of infringement. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor was heard on 19 November 2018. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
Before actually dealing with Teva, he walked the audience through Medeva, Actavis v Sanofi (C-443/12) as well as Eli Lilly v HGS (C-493/12) (both judgments issued on 12 December 2013). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
PatentsKat Neil reflects on the lexical transformation of the “troll” from stock character in Scandinavian mythology (and plastic dolls with bright colored up-combed hair...) into a staple of contemporary IP discourse, not once but twice: The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling"Kat Troll DollIPKat provided further depth commentary on Warner-Lambert v Actavis, delving into the… [read post]
