Search for: "ALLERGAN USA" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 3:31 am by Broc Romanek
I can think of a few proxy fights where the buyer has run board seats like Roche/Illumina or Airgas – or when Valeant solicited consents to get a special meeting called against Allergan. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:58 am by James Yang
  Companies that invent in that area include: Abbot Allergan AMO Development, LLC Applied Medical Resources Corp. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:30 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz) US: Patent protection for the BRCA1 gene and genetic diagnostic methods in the USA: AMP v USPTO (JIPLP) US: Marking with an unenforceable patent does not create intent to deceive: Hollander v Hospira (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US: Regenerative Sciences lawsuit update and FDA’s attempt to broaden the definition of “interstate commerce”: USA v Regenerative Sciences (FDA Law Blog)   Products Embeda (Morphine, Naltrexone) – US: Pfizer,… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
USA, Inc (Orange Book Blog) (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Baristas) (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Patent Prospector) (Patently-O) (GenericsWeb) (Hal Wegner) Famvir (Famciclovir) – US: Teva loses bid to toss Novartis wilful infringement claims over Famvir (Law360) Fentora (Fentanyl) – US: Barr alleges Cima and Cephalon’s patent suit just a delay tactic (Law360) Integrilin (Eptifibatide) – US: Schering alleges patent infringement following Teva’s Para IV… [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Bexis
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873, at *2-5 (D. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:47 pm by Beck, et al.
” That last bit is FDA jargon for the deference accorded to certain administrative agency decisions by Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Allergan USA, Inc., 2009 WL 3294873 (D. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Allergan, Inc. 13-1379Issue: Whether, under Buckman Co. v. [read post]