Search for: "AMAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:11 pm
Bush v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See, e.g., America's Constitution: A Biography 170-73, 556-57 (2006); Akhil Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution 17-19, 404 (2012); see also Akhil Amar, The Words That Made Us 472-465 (2021). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
Professor Amar appears to accept the latter in his earlier book, America’s Constitution: A Biography (pg. 382), though he does not reach a definitive conclusion. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Some have called Moore v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
The prefatory language said: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years… [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Constitution, the charter under which we all live here in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
It is often (and rightly) said today that there are many people and forces working to divide America. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
