Search for: "AMAZON INC" Results 61 - 80 of 1,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2019, 11:58 am by Eric Goldman
This represents the worst loss yet for Amazon over marketplace sales. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:32 pm by Charley
The e-commmerce giant doesn’t have specific ties to WikiLeaks or its founder Julian Assange, but through Amazon.com Inc., it did provide the server space to host the site. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint charges that, among other things, Amazon fails to reasonably accommodate employees' religious practices. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:42 am by zola.support.team
Lipsky Lowe has filed a proposed class action against Amazon.com Inc. for violating a New York City law barring testing applicants for marijuana at local facilities. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:14 am by Dan Bressler
“[Judge] Alsup Calls Amazon In-House Atty’s LinkedIn Gap ‘Suspicious’” — “Mulling a motion to disqualify Amazon’s counsel from litigation accusing the e-commerce giant of infringing MasterObjects Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm by Daily Record Staff
E-commerce giant Amazon Inc. announced Monday it will add 4,400 jobs in Maryland as part of its initiative to fill 100,000 new full- and part-time positions across its facilities in North America U.S. and Canada. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Wall Street Journal, Does Amazon Really Pay No Taxes? [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 7:00 pm
Amazon.com Inc et al, District Court Decision and OrderSecond Circuit Opinion on Appeal [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:04 pm
Indianapolis; IN - Trademark attorneys for JacobsParts, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a trademark infringement suit in alleging United Integral, Inc. of Temple City, California infringed trademark registration nos. 85405544,85567855,7725369 and 85575355 for the marks JPQuality and JacobsParts, which have been issued by the US Trademark Office. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:13 pm by Patent Docs
Amazon filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the '360 patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]