Search for: "AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION" Results 21 - 40 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
 More recently, the registration of mortgage titles in the USA, through “MERS”, the corporate Mortgage Electronic Registration System which currently holds the legal title to 60% of American mortgages, has been instrumental in facilitating the trade of sub-prime mortgages, which have disproportionately resulted in the evictions of black families from their homes (Chakravartty and Ferreira da Silva 2012). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Chris Skelton
As part of our commitment to educating ordinary Americans about their legal rights, Justia provides Justia Legal Guides. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:10 pm by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
It assigned the mortgage and note to Federal Home Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:29 am by Andrew Delaney
  The factual recital: on March 18, 2005, Borrower executed a promissory note to Option One Mortgage Corporation for $54,000, secured by a mortgage on the real property (the note and mortgage are now held by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Lender”)) pursuant to an endorsement in blank contained in an allonge to the note and an assignment of mortgage from American Home Mortgage Serving, Inc. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two biggest home mortgage investing companies in the United States.[8]   The two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are privately-owned corporations authorized to make loans and loan guarantees.[9]  The two giants operate in  American's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
CLASS ACTION CHALLENGES REDUCTION OF MEDICAID HOME-CARE SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
However, case law including American Home Assurance Co. v Nausch, 71 AD3d 550 [1st Dept], recognizes that in some circumstances rescission may have the same effect as subjecting a party to damages for which contribution is allowed, or when the court awards damages where rescission is impossible or impracticable. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
If the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AF1, Appellee. 2nd District. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Daniel Snare
Last term, the Supreme Court addressed the extraterritorial application of Rule 10b-5 in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
HOUSE BELOW GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005-1 TRUST;… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
  In 1998, NAB acquired HomeSide Lending Inc., an American mortgage service provider headquartered in Florida. [read post]