Search for: "ANDREWS v. AC"
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:30 am
Lewis") and Andrew T. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:42 am
Further, section 21(1)(a) only applies in cases of fraud or fraudulent breach of trust, and since it is clear after Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 that knowing assisters are liable on the basis of their own dishonesty, it would be irrational to provide or withhold protection of the limitation to a third party on the basis of the honesty, or otherwise of the trustee. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:22 pm
[Ace; Patterico] [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am
Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] AC 534). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] 2 AC 465 made clear that it was only an exceptional case where domestic law would not provide sufficient protection for Art. 8 purposes. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 pm
Analogies can be drawn with the Court’s concerns in this jurisdiction in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2016] 1 AC 108), albeit that was a civil privacy case and not a criminal one. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
ANDREW M. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’… [read post]
26 May 2021, 11:48 am
Ace Fire Underwriters Ins. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:10 pm
(The official citation for the decision is AC Ocean Walk, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
” Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic provides “5 quick takes” on the federal government’s brief. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
V. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The fourth speaker was Andrew P. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:52 pm
There, the Court of Appeal simply adopted the majority’s position in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284 that a court need only possess in personam jurisdiction over a defendant to issue Mareva injunctions against him. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
And, in the application of Jameel, the UK Supreme Court in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273, [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) provided significant latitude to editorial judgment. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
” See Frank, “Riverboat Poker & Paradoxes: The Vioxx Mass-Tort Settlement,” 12 Andrews Drug Recall Litig. [read post]
