Search for: "ANIMAL PROTECTION SOC. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Dorf) addresses some of the common puzzles, themes, and challenges that animate and confront both the pro-life and animal rights movements. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
June 14, 2023) — ruling that communications between South Dakota state officials and the National Guard (a hybrid state-federal entity) did not fall within Exemption 5’s consultant corollary exception because they were not made for purpose of aiding the National Guard’s deliberations; noting that its ruling “produced an odd outcome considering that these discussions would be protected either under Exemption 5 (if wholly federal) and under South… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
The nature and effects of constitutional state objectives: assessing the German Basic Law’s animal protection clause. 16 Animal L. 213-257 (2010).Huss, Rebecca J. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]