Search for: "APPLICATION OF SIMMONS"
Results 1 - 20
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2017, 12:57 pm
By Kurt Leyendecker Gene Simmons (of the rock band, “Kiss,” fame) recently filed a trademark application for the registration of a variation of the “devil horns” hand gesture, and it has caused some uproar in the music community among fans and fellow metal musicians. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:15 am
Just two weeks later, Simmons reconsidered if he had valid trademark rights to the hand gesture, as he abandoned the application. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
” According to the application, Simmons first used the hand gesture in commerce November 14, 1974. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:44 am
Justice Yu authored the 33 -page opinion This case concerns a recent law school graduate's application to sit for... [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:29 am
A number of outlets have posted on the Gene Simmons (KISS) trademark application for a hand gesture ("sign of the horns") [US serial no. 87482739 for a service mark. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
" Therefore, Applicant argued, SIMMONS will not be perceived primarily as a surname "because of the mark's association with Gene Simmons, ... and the other SIMMONS trademarks owned by Applicant" [including GENE SIMMONS TONGUE for a magazine]. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
An earlier post dedicated to Simmons's trade mark application reported on a number of uses of the so-called devil's horn (also known as 'I love you' in sign language) recorded prior to Simmons's alleged first performance of the hand gesture. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
An earlier post dedicated to Simmons's trade mark application reported on a number of uses of the so-called devil's horn (also known as 'I love you' in sign language) recorded prior to Simmons's alleged first performance of the hand gesture. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
In short, applicant failed to proved, as required by Section 2(f), that its use of SIMMONS has been substantially exclusive.The Board concluded that the surname SIMMONS had not acquired distinctiveness for applicant's legal services.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:34 pm
Simmons suffered “critical” injuries to his head. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:27 am
More interestingly perhaps, is the claim made by Simmons that "the mark was first used by the applicant [him] or the applicant's related company or licensee or predecessor in interest at least as early as 11/14/1974, and first used in commerce at least as early as 11/14/1974". [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
” Under Simmons, “[a]mong the ways an applicant may make such a showing is by establishing that local counsel possessing requisite experience were unwilling or unable to take the case. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
On 28 July last, the IPKat and Simmons & Simmons co-hosted a panel discussion between Simon Malynicz QC (3 New Square), Lauri Rechardt (IFPI's Director of Licensing and Legal Policy) and Eleonora Rosati (IPKat), chaired by Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons), on the implications of the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier [noted here].The following is a review of the event by Jonathan… [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:46 pm
Use Simmons’ analysis when fighting the application of the residual clause to other, non-enumerated offense. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
Today, as part of my series with local appraisers, I am interviewing Matt Simmons, an appraiser and principal with the firm of Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
Today, as part of my series with local appraisers, I am interviewing Matt Simmons, an appraiser and principal with the firm of Maxwell, Hendry & Simmons, LLC. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
That clearly violated Simmons v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Enlarge / Gene Simmons of KISS performing in 2015. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Enlarge / Gene Simmons of KISS performing in 2015. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:35 am
Moreover, at the time Simmons was decided, the applicable version of Code of Civil Procedure section 581d did not require that a dismissal order be signed by the trial court for it to be considered an appealable judgment. [read post]
