Search for: "ASSOCIATION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION, ETC. v. Weeks" Results 41 - 60 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
Virginia defended the law asserting that it did not violate the 14th Amendment because it did not discriminate on the basis of race. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And, of course, a liberty rationale in Obergefell leaves open—in a way that an equality-based rationale would not—questions about whether discrimination against gays and lesbians in things like public employment, housing, jury service, etc. are permissible. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Hilary Page
Check out last week’s post for more on notice, benefits, bonuses and commissions. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
Part V – Movements against abortion This Part begins with abortion politics in Brazil and the backlash that occurred with the government of former president Bolsonaro who, as is well known, is against abortion. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:26 am by Heidi Henson
In a March 12, 2013, decision, a federal court in Pennsylvania found that a company committed three separate torts (unauthorized use of name, invasion of privacy, and misappropriation of publicity) by taking over a discharged executive’s LinkedIn account for two weeks and posting her successor’s information on the page (Eagle v Morgan, No. 11-4303). [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
” The violence associated with this communal fear is concerning: “[h]ardly a week passes in South Africa without press reports of witches being killed. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
It is all their fault, according to Ezra.In my view, they need legal protection against discrimination and harassment. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Rory Little
(Disclosure: I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of the American Bar Association in support of Hurst.) [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
§768.096 (presumption against negligent hiring if employer conducts criminal background check); Blair v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Supreme Court rulings dealing with so-called “affirmative action” programs involve the government directly doling out to individuals dollars, university admission slots, etc., in Fullilove v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Slightly larger percentage, 20%, is completely against it for privacy reasons. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Against Jury Trials in Argentina Valerie P. [read post]