Search for: "AT&T Corp v. FCC" Results 61 - 80 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
tsf actions remain core under §§548 & 544. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HellerEhrman-BK-ND-CA-Montali-9-28-11.pdf … D-TX: Per Stern, BK Ct can't dismiss nondbtr intervenor (& BK Claimant) allegations of fr. inducement in dbtr's BK acq. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/AIHAcquisitions-ND-TX-McBryde-9-7-11.pdf … SDNY: No mand. abstention vs GT per §1334(c)(2) also bec… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
AT&T Co. (1994) exemplifies how textualists ought to apply the Whole-Text Canon. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell discusses last week’s decision in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
While the Supreme Court didn’t cause that result directly, the lower courts that did cause it could not have done their work without reliance on two factually idiosyncratic opinions issued more than forty years ago. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:23 pm by Mark Walsh
” Maybe a lot of people don’t read it, Gorsuch continues, not least because “maybe they can’t read it. [read post]