Search for: "ATES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
The lifecycle of the ATS tracks almost exactly the lifecycle of the human rights movement in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
– Sosa v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:03 pm
The case challenging this law was in fact 50 consolidated cases in Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am
” The Second Circuit rejected this logic holding that Daimler—and its own related circuit precedent, Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Donald Rumsfeld and the United States of America, Nos. 10-1687, 10-2442 (7th Cir. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:33 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
by Kenneth Anderson I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Wallace, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent.U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:41 am
The United States faced powerful potential adversaries, three of which (Britain,France and Spain) had bases in North America and the ability to project force around the globe. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
The ABA argues that a narrow reading of the ATS would “diminish the United States’ voice in fostering universal adherence to norms of international law. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am
MTD, 221 USPQ 657 (CAFC 1984) or the "bakingbread" case [ Chef America v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Although Rio Tinto has operations in many countries, including the United States, and Sarei lived in the United States as a resident alien when the complaint was filed, nothing done by Americans or in America, is at issue. [read post]
