Search for: "AUTO CREDIT INC v LONG"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2021, 9:07 am
The Massachusetts Attorney General recently settled a major consumer fraud case against subprime auto lender Credit Acceptance Corporation. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 4:41 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 344 (7th Cir.1997), quoted in Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 9:30 am
Advanced Auto Parts, Inc., No. 08-1568, 2009 WL 799760 (E.D. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
Auto. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Proof that the plaintiff has submitted "enough facts to enable [the] court to determine that a viable" cause of action exists (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d at 71; see Gray v Doyle, 170 AD3d at 971) may be established by an affidavit of a party or someone with knowledge, authenticated documentary proof, or by complaint verified by the plaintiff that sufficiently details the facts and the basis for the defendant's liability (see CPLR 105[u]; Woodson… [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:07 pm
Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc. (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1371, 1388; Lectrodryer v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:15 am
Not long. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The sweeping interpretation that a state court gave to a routine registration statute and an accompanying power of attorney that Pennsylvania Fire credited as a general “consent” has yielded to the doctrinal refinement reflected in [Bauman] and the Court’s 21st century approach to general and specific jurisdiction.Id. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
, Summers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
These ATTM allies argue that it does not matter what the evidence in a case would show, that it does not matter what the state law at issue says, and that there is simply a federal right for any corporation to put in any contract a term that bans class actions (so long as the contract includes an arbitration clause). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
Costs -- Section 57.105 does not provide mechanism for recovering costs GRAND RESERVE AT TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and BUSINESS LAW GROUP, P.A., Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Auto. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Cadence Bank v. [read post]
