Search for: "Abraham v. Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
For this proposition, C&L cited one of our favorite cases: United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Although surrogacy ostensibly dates to biblical days—Abraham and Sarah’s handmaiden, Hagar, for example—it is quintessentially a modern path to parenthood. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
As that policy trajectory evolves, however, it more and more directly comes into conflict with the trajectories of religious freedom development in liberal democratic states, and the ancient traditions of transnational religious communities--not just the Abrahamic faiths, but others as well. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff was an assistant attending physician for thoracic diseases in the department of thoracic diseases at Mt. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
xix Lewis v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am
The union is the only permenancy of the department. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
The full defamation trial is due to continue in March 2024 before Abraham J. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:05 pm
See generally Knox v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1] At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
He chronicles the deeds of Noah, Abraham, and Sarah, among others. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
In particular, this post is about the multiple pages of sanctimonious hogwash (summarized here), served up last week by the Homeland Security Department's Office of Inspector General ("The Effects of USCIS Adjudication Procedures and Policies on Fraud Detection by Immigration Services Officers"). [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Let me proceed on the view (whether or not I have convinced everyone that this view is correct) that the NBNP bill violates the plain terms of the 27th Amendment. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I think that Kenneth Stampp was basically correct many years ago when he said that, at least for historians, the legitimacy of secession remained an open—and perhaps unanswerable—question, a conclusion recently reaffirmed by Daniel Hamilton. [read post]
