Search for: "Accutane Litigation"
Results 81 - 100
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
In granting a Rule 702 motion to exclude the expert witnesses who relied upon a DPA, the trial judge rejected the probativeness of DPAs, based upon the FDA’s rejection of such analyses for anything other than signal detection.[3] In the Accutane litigation, statistician David Madigan attempted to support his fatally weak causation opinion with a DPA for Crohn’s disease and Accutane adverse event reports. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 11:34 am
Litig., No. 12-MD-2342, 2016 WL 1320799, at *11 (E.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Singh abandoned his own interpretative principle to suit the litigation needs of the case. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
We're unlikely, for example, to see thousands of "Accutane caused me to commit suicide" cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:17 am
Jury Assesses $2.62M Against Roche in Accutane Trial
New Jersey Law Journal
A New Jersey jury has assessed $2.62 million in damages against Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and its Swiss parent company in the first of 400 suits to be tried over the acne drug Accutane's propensity to cause inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:19 am
Here’s a quick look at what they’ve been up to: London, Ontario law firm Harrison Pensa announced it would be representing Canadian members of a class action who have developed IBD or Stevens Johnson Syndrome as a result of taking Accutane. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Your lawyering skills presumably had nothing to do with it.One judge grants a Daubert motion, holding that the evidence linking Accutane to inflammatory bowel disease is junk science, inadmissible in a court of law. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
Zambelli-Weiner’s Litigation Road Map In a world where social justice warriors complain about organizations such as Exponent, for its litigation support of defense efforts, the revelation that Zambelli-Weiner was helping to quarterback the plaintiffs’ offense deserves greater recognition. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Litig., 299 F. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:34 am
All these elements were on display in the Vioxx litigation in Atlantic County. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
We cannot conclude that [defendant] had a duty to withhold. . .a medication her doctor determined was an appropriate treatment for her unless [plaintiff] agreed to the use of contraceptive techniques that may have violated her religious principles.Id. at 1241 (Accutane birth defects case). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
Evid. 502 - an update (5/30/07)"Relatedness" assessments (In re Accutane) (5/28/07)Preemption lite (5/24/07)Riegel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:05 am
The award is the largest that an Accutane user has won against the drugmaker. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm
Pa. 2014) (excluding perinatal epidemiologist, Anick Bérard, for biased cherry picking of data points); In re Accutane, No. 271(MCL), 2015 WL 753674, 2015 BL 59277 (N.J.Super. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
Physicians have no duty of loyalty requiring them to support their patients in litigation. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Some drugs that have been the subject of litigation and/or recalls in the past include: Accutane Celebrex Crestor Ephedra Meridia Paxil Provigil Serevent Serzone Vioxx At Gainsberg Law P.C., our Chicago medical malpractice lawyers work with experienced pharmacists and medication experts who understand when other pharmacists acted incompetently and when medications are defective. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:42 pm
One judge grants a Daubert motion, holding that the evidence linking Accutane to inflammatory bowel disease is junk science, inadmissible in a court of law. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:33 am
In re Accutane Litigation, 234 N.J. 340, 191 A.3d 560, Prod. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Litigation cannot proceed at this deliberative speed. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
The gravamen of the defense’s appeal was that these expert witnesses had failed to support their opinions and that the trial judge had misapplied the established judicial gatekeeping procedures required by the New Jersey Supreme Court, in In re Accutane Litigation, 234 N.J. 340 (2018). [read post]
