Search for: "Actavis L" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Joining the majority of European courts, the Paris Court of Justice ruled that Eli Lilly’s patent, which relates to the combined administration of pemetrexed disodium and vitamin B12, was infringed by the marketing of Fresenius’ pemetrexed diacid. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
 Katfriend Oliver Löffel (Löffel Abrar) analyses the legal perils of tweeting using the hashtag #Rio2016 and explores how the position varies in different territories.Compulsory collective management of copyright for images displayed by search engines: a French cultural exception to EU law Katfriend Olivia Klimis and Nicolas Lescot (De Gaulle Fleurance & Associés) take a look at new provisions in the French Intellectual Property Code (IPC) that… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
  Big Pharma has waged a protracted battle against AB 824 in the courts, which has taken yet another turn.[1] In December 2021, Judge Troy L. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Muller at Excess of Democracy, while at The Daily Beast, Richard L. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 2:28 am
Now think of the fact that the average body has only five times that amount (5 liters) of blood circulating at any given moment, and you can see just how important it is for a drug manufacturer to get it right the first time.That is because it only takes as little 4.0 ug/L to be in the toxic range. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
While Aerotel placed a large wedge between the EPO Board of Appeals and English courts, recent cases have been bridging the gap, particularly in the area of obviousness in non-software cases (namely, Conor v Angiotech and Actavis v Merck). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Actavis | Can YouTube be primarily liable for users' infringements? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
Richard observes that these comments are made all the more relevant by the recent Kat-rant over the pathetically short time available for consultation in Actavis v Sanofi, a reference to the CJEU in which, this Kat believes, a good case could be made out for a more generous time allowance given the political and economic significance of the case's outcome. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
| L'Oreal v RN Ventures - The Registered Design Perspective | More than Just a Game: Music, video games, GDPR & technical protective measures” (Report 2 and Report 3) | German FCJ: doctors can have their profile deleted from rating site - but can they? [read post]