Search for: "Adams v. American President Lines"
Results 1 - 20
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
Curt Nichols and Adam Myers make the novel argument for a multiple-presidency reconstruction here. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:22 am
For many of us in the free speech community, President Biden has become the most anti-free speech president since John Adams. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez, The President and Immigration Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Aziz Huq“The President and Immigration Law” is a first-rate contribution not just to legal scholarship but also the interdisciplinary study of American state development. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:19 am
As I argued in this article, since that time, the president’s power to threaten war has grown dramatically and become central to American foreign policy. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:10 am
Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. of New York meeting with President Lyndon B. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
The unique American provides no direct election of President and Vice-President. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:22 pm
It appears that when President Trump seemed poised to stop the review, Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
For example, Blackman argues that the president’s exclusive recognition power as described by the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
Ashcroft in 2003 and in Islamic American Relief Agency v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Smith and Desmond King’s compelling and sobering book, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Adam B. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Malkawi, Associate Professor of Law, American University of Sharjah." [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
And as always, please drop a line or a comment if I've missed one. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
And so a specter is haunting the American presidency—the [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Given the absence of a bright-line rule governing waiver of contractual arbitration rights under the Supreme Court's totality-of-the-circumstances precedent in Perry Homes v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am
Now, only the veto power of the president, supported by an adamant Democratic minority in Congress stands between us and meaningful health insurance reform that will improve rather than harm American health care. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
The order was narrow in place – only along the military line – if not in time. [read post]
