Search for: "Adams v. District of Columbia"
Results 201 - 220
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
But the shift toward textualism and originalism as methods of interpretation has been stark, even among liberal judges: in the 2nd Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
What’s more, the post’s basic argument seems to me indistinguishable from arguments a half-century ago that the Fourteenth Amendment should not be read to ban segregated schools in the states because Congress in the 1860s and ‘70s set up and funded segregated schools in the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy and David Kravets at WIRED have coverage of the Department of Justice’s brief on remand in Jones, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia last week relied on Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to bar Texas from enforcing its photo ID requirement for voters in this fall’s election. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm
The Lincoln Group of the District of Columbia hosts a day-long symposium on Lincoln, War, and the Constitution on Saturday, September 15, 2012, in the E. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle has coverage of the brief submitted by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, while Zoe Tillman of the Blog of Legal Times reports on the District of Columbia’s decision to join a brief with fourteen states and the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Medical marijuana would be available to patients in 17 states, plus the District of Columbia, free from harassment by federal officials. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
His scholarly (yet dramatic) historic narrative uses the 2008 Supreme Court Case of District Columbia v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:39 am
Reproductive Rights: The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution will hold a hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803), which would ban abortions after 20 weeks in the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:46 am
The first thread tells the captivating story of District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
" Last month, a federal district court in the District of Columbia upheld the notice-posting requirement, finding no evidence that Congress intended to preclude the board from promulgating such a rule. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, settled on Friday. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the reasoning on which they relied to reach that conclusion varied. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned his conviction, saying the sheer amount of information that had been collected violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. [read post]
