Search for: "Adams v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania" Results 21 - 40 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he Supreme Court’s order was expected, as the Pennsylvania court had based its decision solely on the state constitution,” and “[o]n matters of state law, the judgments of state supreme courts are typically final. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
 In 1989, the Supreme Court appointed Roberts to argue his first case before the Court, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm by CAFE
The Trump Corporation et al., NY Supreme Court New York County, indictment, 7/1/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm by CAFE
The Trump Corporation et al., NY Supreme Court New York County, indictment, 7/1/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm by CAFE
The Trump Corporation et al., NY Supreme Court New York County, indictment, 7/1/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:48 pm by CAFE
The Trump Corporation et al., NY Supreme Court New York County, indictment, 7/1/21 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
” The State of Texas filed a complaint in the United States Supreme Court, in an attempt to invoke that court’s original jurisdiction to adjudicate Texas’ complaint that it was harmed by voting procedures in four states in which Trump lost the popular vote. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States also centers on how lower courts interpret fractured Supreme Court decisions in which five of the court’s nine justices fail to come to an agreement,” such as “Rapanos v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:34 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court denies state legislatures the unchecked power to set election rules (Zach Montellaro & Josh Gerstein, Politico) Supreme Court Allows Unusual Pennsylvania Law on Corporate Suits (Abbie VanSickle & Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court says a conviction for online threats violated 1st Amendment (Ann E. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, which the court granted on Monday, combines “’evil villains, outrageous facts, and sympathetic clients. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a September decision in the case of Adamitis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
* Where does Justice Brett Kavanaugh fit along the ideological spectrum at the Supreme Court? [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
Adam Liptak at NYT previews Black v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Holder on June 25, 2013, part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was invalidated by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In The University of Pennsylvania’s Regulatory Review, Lori Fox looks at the court’s decision this term in Endrew F. v. [read post]