Search for: "Advanced Computer Services v. MAI SYSTEMS"
Results 1 - 20
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
Services Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:46 pm
A phone system adds more advanced features to your phone service, such as enabling extensions and the ability to route calls differently depending on any number of factors. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm
Bancorp Services, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:43 am
[W]hile the . . . patent claims feature other, specific limitations and requirements, such as the use of RFID receivers and the need for a 'remote computer system' or PDA to identify vehicles and communicate their scofflaw status to a centralized host system, none are directed to a technological improvement in how each component works, or in how the use of each component promotes a technological advance. . . . [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
On May 14, 2009, Rossini was sentenced to1) twelve months of probation for each of the five counts, to run concurrently; 2) a special assessment fee of $125; 3) a fine of $5,000 to be paid at a monthly rate of $250; and 4) 250 hours of community service. . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Services Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:30 am
See U.S. v Nosal (9th Cir, Apr. 10, 2012, 10-10038). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
See Austin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
An investigation revealed that Dent was assigned on the computer system to a hospital overtime shift 388 times. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm
District Court for the District of Nevada found these activities were noncompensable preliminary and postliminary activities because “[s]tarting and turning off computers and clocking in and out of a timekeeping system are not principal activities because [the employer] did not hire its customer service agents to turn computers on and off or to clock in and out of a timekeeping system. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 pm
On December 3, 2010, Ontario arbitrators released a decision in Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Patent No. 7,725,375 on "systems and computer program products for exchanging an obligation"Don't be misled by words like "apparatus", "systems", and "computer program products". [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
’ Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:21 am
CheckFree Services Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:21 am
According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), “cyber crime” involves three general activities: “Cyber attacks” target a computer system and include things like creating and spreading computer viruses, denial of service (DOS)attacks, vandalism, and sabotage; “Cyber thefts” access a computer system to steal things and includes embezzlement, fraud, theft of intellectual property, and theft of… [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 12:07 am
Court of Claims in October, the Department of Interior (DOI) sought a cloud service provider to outfit the agency with a single hosted email and collaboration services system in an effort to centralize its messaging services, which currently includes thirteen separate email platforms. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 pm
Carefully draft service agreements to comply in advance with the SCA and other wiretap type statutes with "consent" language. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
UFRF argued that the claim was more than well understood or conventional activities because the “converting” took place at a remote location, citing BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
An “interactive computer service” is defined as “any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet…. [read post]
