Search for: "Alaska Juris, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
High Court The Recorder High-tech lawyers and their clients were relieved in February 2005 when the California Supreme Court took up a controversial case in which Genentech Inc. had been hit with a $500 million jury verdict -- $200 million of it in punitive damages. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
A jury awarded the terminated shareholder (Kevin) over $5 million based on the valuation calculated by his expert appraiser. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  A broader formulation exempts anything that is government "regulated" (Alaska, Nebraska, Oklahoma). [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Except in punitive damages cases, the effect of compliance is usually something the jury decides. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:08 am
In 2002, Alaska high school student Joseph Frederick was suspended for displaying a banner bearing the message: "BONG HITS 4 JESUS. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Alaska, and this error was notharmless under the Brecht standard. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 6:29 am
Jaynes was tried on the charges and convicted by a jury. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Eugene Volokh
—on behalf of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.; here is the heart of our argument, which I think largely coincides with the court's: Summary of Argument When Covenant Reformed Church described the lead plaintiffs' conduct as adulterous, it was expressing a moral evaluation of uncontested facts—an opinion based on those facts. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Hebdon, 19-122Issue: Whether Alaska’s $500 individual-to-candidate and individual-to-group contribution limits violate the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
Mann, 18-1477, and National Review, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Alaska found "falls far short of the reasonable precision necessary to define criminal conduct. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case of the woman prisoner went to trial, after summary judgment was denied to those she sued, and she won a jury verdict of $625,000. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard, courts look at “what a… [read post]