Search for: "Allan v. Department of Health" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 In summary, the dealing requirement is part of the ratio of OBG v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1 and no good or sufficient reason has been shown why the Court should depart from the relatively recent decision of the House of Lords in OBG in accordance with the 1966 Practice Statement. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Photo of the “New Virginia Law to Preserve Racial Integrity” from the Virginia Health Bulletin by the Virginia Department of Health, March 1924, Vol. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:34 am
The building is the 18 500m corporate head office of blue-chip tenant Allan Gray. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
The research assignment involved searching the archives of a local Pensacola newspaper, in the 1940s, for coverage of smoking’s ill health effects. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
The research assignment involved searching the archives of a local Pensacola newspaper, in the 1940s, for coverage of smoking’s ill health effects. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm by Howard Knopf
Attorney General of Canada re Health Canada for $90,100.55 + punitive damages of $25,000. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm by Howard Knopf
Attorney General of Canada re Health Canada for $90,100.55 + punitive damages of $25,000. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
After a thoughtful and extensive survey of the law concerning pets, the Travis Court determined that the most appropriate standard to apply when deciding with whom a pet should reside is the one found in the First Department case, Raymond v Lachmann (264 AD2d 340, 341 [1st Dept 1999]), the "best for all concerned" standard. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Moon, No. 06-5581 "Defendant's conviction and sentence for health care fraud and making false statements regarding health care matters is affirmed over challenges to: 1) a denial of her motion to dismiss one count of her indictment; 2) a denial of her motion to suppress evidence; 3) the reasonableness of her sentence; and 4) evidentiary rulings with respect to 'summary evidence.[' " U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
However the medical context shows the capacity of multiple professionals, with different skills and pay-grades, to operate ethically: Capping legal fees should “not be outside the realm of possibility” We need to consider different ways to make legal aid as universal and comprehensive as health care in Canada Law students have extremely high expectations re their future earnings, most in the class she teaches would not accept even a guaranteed salary of $150k / year 4. [read post]