Search for: "Allen v. State Board of Elections" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Village Board contended that Allen was not a resident of the Village the time of election in November 2008, nor is he now, and thus ineligible to serve as the Village Mayor, citing Village Law §300(1). [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:08 pm by Mark Theodore
As Judge James Boasberg stated in his ruling: According to Woody Allen, eighty percent of life is just showing up.   [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” ** In Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Sodus, N.Y. v Allen, 2011 NY Slip Op 31035(U), [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports], Supreme Court Judge Dennis M. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
Allen (No. 10-63), which has been relisted intermittently a few times, has been relisted once again, as the Court considers what action it should take in the case in light of last week’s decision in Walker v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am by Jason M. Halper
  Rather, the compelling justification concept articulated by Chancellor Allen in Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
This rule applies to the following persons: Any elected U.S. official. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Amicus brief of International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention et al. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
In April 2017, in response to the residency challenge, appellee wrote a letter to the Board of Elections in which he stated that he believed that he had been menaced by appellants. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Allen); City of Charleston v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
New York State Bd. of Elections, No. 07-5367 In a challenge to state law prohibiting the use of absentee ballots in elections for county committee members brought under the First Amendment, grant of summary judgment for defendant state board of elections is reversed where: 1) the arguments proffered by the State are so extraordinarily weak that they cannot justify the burdens imposed by Election Law section 7-122; and… [read post]