Search for: "Allen v. State Board of Elections" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 9:00 am by Matthew Campbell
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States in Allen v Milligan upheld the lower court’s determination that the newly adopted Alabama congressional maps likely violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Village Board contended that Allen was not a resident of the Village the time of election in November 2008, nor is he now, and thus ineligible to serve as the Village Mayor, citing Village Law §300(1). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:11 am by Squire Patton Boggs
Among other feats, Judge Allen was the first woman in America appointed prosecutor (1919), elected to a general trial court (1920), elected to a state supreme court (1922), and shortlisted for nomination to the United States Supreme Court (1938). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maksym Et Al. , Appellees, v The Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago, Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, Docket No. 111773. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Maksym Et Al. , Appellees, v The Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago, Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, Docket No. 111773. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:08 pm by Mark Theodore
   As Judge James Boasberg stated in his ruling: According to Woody Allen, eighty percent of life is just showing up. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” ** In Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Sodus, N.Y. v Allen, 2011 NY Slip Op 31035(U), [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports], Supreme Court Judge Dennis M. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
§  Amicus brief of International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention et al. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As Chancellor Allen stated long ago, the threat cannot be justified on the grounds that the board knows what is in the best interests of the stockholders. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
Democratic National Committee and Allen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:51 am by Ted Allen
While the pension fund argued that the board’s stated reasons for its decision were inconsistent with the record, the judge did not agree. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am by Jason M. Halper
  Rather, the compelling justification concept articulated by Chancellor Allen in Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]