Search for: "Allied Industrial Group, Inc. v. AM General LLC" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[116] Turner and Rumsfeld rejected similar claims.[117] Even the district court opinion striking down the specific Florida social media access rules in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Many scientists have become increasingly concerned about the effect industrial emissions of CO2 are having on the chemistry of the world’s oceans and about the fallout for many species of marine animals. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.,15 permitted plaintiffs’ expert witness to reanalyze a study by grouping together two previously distinct cancer outcomes to generate a statistically significant result. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Generally speaking (though with some potential exceptions), the answer is Oklahoma law, as the California Supreme Court held in McCann v. [read post]