Search for: "Amaral"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In two of my last three Verdict columns (this one and then this one co-authored with Jason Mazzone), I have discussed—in connection with the Supreme Court’s consideration in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:11 pm
Amar Gandhi said. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
“In this new podcast, Professor Amar offers weekly in-depth discussions on the most urgent and fascinating constitutional issues of our day. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
As early as the mid-1990s, Tillman noticed that even textualist scholars, most notably Akhil Reed Amar, treated the Constitution's offices and officers language as if every title meant the exact same thing. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:17 am
Amar Desai, CEO of Optum Health, reveals a collaborative stance among affected companies, emphasizing the call for unity and swift response in the face of cybersecurity challenges. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we raise and begin to analyze several interesting legal issues raised by the recent decision by a federal district court judge to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the Disney Corporation against Florida officials for alleged retaliation (against Disney’s outspoken opposition to certain Florida laws and policies) by altering the structure of the board that regulates the land in which Disney World is located. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:54 am
Frederic Megret and Amar Khoday (McGill University - Faculty of Law and University of Manitoba - Faculty of Law) have posted 'We Want to Live! [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail has already been addressed by our scholarship. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
[Justice Kavanaugh was right. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
“What the Oral Argument Should Have Said”: You can access the new episode of law professor Akhil Reed Amar‘s podcast, “Amarica’s Constitution,” via this link. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:32 am
Compartieron su historia de complicidad y amor a la justicia. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:38 am
Also online there, law professor Vikram David Amar has an essay titled “The Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The value of Professor Amar’s article was to show how landmark cases built on the principle and how it could generate further insights.Yet Professor Amar recognized that one can take intratextualism too far. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court’s manipulation of the meaning of Section Three can’t address the basic reality that states can (and ultimately will) do whatever they want as long as we have an electoral college model for picking Presidents, something on which our originalist Constitution is (for better or worse) quite clear.Follow @prof_amar Vikram David Amar is a [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Akhil Amar went justice by justice to explain why it was credible for each one to side with him, in an especially detailed and vivid example of Supreme Court fan fiction. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
It is fair enough to cite Akhil Amar here, but Mitchell has to realize Amar thinks his position is a "gimmick" or worse. [read post]
