Search for: "Amato v. U. S.*#"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” However, in Amato v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Judge Porteous also engaged in corrupt conduct after the Lifemark v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:22 am
Judge Ruchelsman spends time peeling back the onion layers in Woodcock v Birnbaum 2018 NY Slip Op 32841(U) November 7, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 507014/18 to come to the decision on whether there was a violation of Judiciary Law § 487. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:19 am
Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Apr. 2, 2019]. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
Two weeks ago, in Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 51471(U) [Sup Ct, Erie County Sept. 13, 2019], a dispute between a law firm partner and his former colleagues, raising the identical issue as D’Amato & Lynch, reached its climax in a highly-interesting, post-trial decision by Erie County Commercial Division Justice Timothy J. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
Here are some of our favorite cases addressing the partner/PINO dilemma: D’Esposito v Gusrae, Kaplan & Bruno PLLC, 44 AD 3d 512 (1st Dept 2007) (attorney who did not sign PLLC operating agreement but nonetheless received K-1s held not a partner); Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905(U) (Sup Ct NY County, April 2, 2019) (attorney who did not sign partnership agreement but received K-1s identifying him as a… [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The NMA’s submission can be read here. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]