Search for: "American Federation of Labor v. Labor Board"
Results 201 - 220
of 966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Bennett, American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Labor force participation—especially for men—has fallen to its lowest point since World War II.[2] Unlike that immediate post-war period, it is now more common for both partners in a married household to work. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:53 pm
As we previously discussed earlier this month, District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an Order in American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
Gould served as Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB, 1994–98) and subsequently Chairman of the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board (2014-2017). [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
The National Labor Relations Board decided in 2019 that it does not have jurisdiction over labor complaints from gig workers. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
To be clear, no federal charges have been brought. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm
In addition, reductions for any employees must continue to comply with applicable state, federal, or local minimum wage laws. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent ruling, Durham v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:10 pm
Jackson in Wong Yang Sung v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
The Two Seizures The first signs of trouble came in 1942, when Avery insisted that he would not accede to a deal with the union representing workers at Montgomery Ward’s central Chicago warehouse (devised by the National War Labor Board, or NWLB, a federal agency for mediating labor disputes) unless personally ordered to comply by the president. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am
In a 2014 case called National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
Fortunately, the 2018 memorandum was recently declared unlawful and invalidated by a federal judge in the case Itserve Alliance Inc., et al., v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
