Search for: "Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 1:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 2017 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et al., No. 16-108 (Achates redux – review of statute-of-limitations for filing IPR requests) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et al., No. 16-108 (Achates redux – review of statute-of-limitations for filing IPR requests) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions for Writ of Certiorari Denied or Dismissed: Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:36 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The Supreme Court denied certiorari today in Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Fossil, Inc., et al, No. 16-202 (SCA Redux plus TM issue) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Cordis Corporation, et al., No. 15-998 (follow-on to SCA) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Cordis Corporation, et al., No. 15-998 (follow-on to SCA) Safe Harbor: Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the Federal Circuit interpreted two important sections of the infringement statute, 35 USC § 271. [read post]