Search for: "Anderson v. American Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 5:29 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
” The lawsuit, filed in November 2004, was assigned to Federal District Court Judge Wayne Anderson of the Northern District of Illinois and Magistrate Judge Susan Cox, and is captioned EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
The paper sets out an argument that apportionment is a 20th century reform of American tort law, from the common law’s “all or nothing” approach.[1] I respectfully disagree with Professor Green’s assessment. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Conference of September 29, 2008 __________________ Docket: 07-811 Case name: Morris, et al. v Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
Northwest Airlines, Inc., et al.Court: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-2393  October 14, 2011 Judge: Bye Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiff brought a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213, alleging that his employer engaged in prohibited discrimination by rescinding his offer of promotion on the basis of his perceived limitations. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
ADA      The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)[10] prohibits employers from discriminating, in employment and benefits, against a qualified individual with a disability.11 The ADA also prohibits medical inquiries or examinations[12] of applicants and employees regarding the existence, nature or severity of a disability unless job-related and consistent with business necessity. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Caitlin Gilligan, Rishabh Bhandari
The transaction, which is estimated to be worth roughly $17 to $25 billion, would be the most significant business deal between Iran and an American company in decades. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]