Search for: "Anderson v. City of New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The former New York mayor logged a decade with the law and lobbying firm then known as Bracewell & Giuliani and a two-year stint after that with Greenberg Traurig. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:16 am
Plaintiff alleges that it had direct communications with Gibson and Seinuk during the course of the project; that defendants were aware that the drawings submitted were incorrect insofar as Gibson failed to reference structural insulated panels (SIPs); that Seinuk negligently advised plaintiff to back the SIPs with plywood out of concern for wind shear and failed to advise plaintiff that doing so would violate the New York City Building Code; that Gibson and Seinuk knew… [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm
Vito Caruso will oversee cases outside New York City, which will be assigned to four regionally designated judges: Justice Michael Mackey, Justice Michael V. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Paul Manafort has been moved to the Metropolitan Correctional Facility in New York City to face state mortgage fraud charges. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Leiter also notes that, during the 1930s, the University of Chicago hired, as one of its new faculty members, a PhD in Philosophy even though he lacked a degree in law. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Byte marks: making sense of new F.R.C.P. 37(e). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff served as a resident, at the Sea View Hospital, in New York City.18 April 23, 1945. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
Plaintiff alleges that it had direct communications with Gibson and Seinuk during the course of the project; that defendants were aware that the drawings submitted were incorrect insofar as Gibson failed to reference structural insulated panels (SIPs); that Seinuk negligently advised plaintiff to back the SIPs with plywood out of concern for wind shear and failed to advise plaintiff that doing so would violate the New York City Building Code; that Gibson and Seinuk knew… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
New Jersey, 637 F.3d 177, 181 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Anderson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
In addition, the opposing affidavit of plaintiff’s expert states that the architects and engineers misrepresented that they were the Special Inspection Agency on their submissions to the New York City Department of Buildings. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:29 pm
Also in The New York Times is a review of Carol Anderson's One Person, No Vote: How Voter Suppression Is Destroying Our Democracy.Merve Emre's The Personality Brokers: The Strange History of Myers-Briggs and the Birth of Personality Testing is reviewed in The New Republic. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
For example, New York state and New York city passed legislation in April and May 2018 that generally prohibits confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements addressing sexual harassment claims. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" That was the headline from columnists Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta in Washington Post on January 15, 1986. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:11 pm
Huvelle suggested that while she might not have jurisdiction over the case, courts located in New York likely would: several senior campaign officials, along with Stone, resided in New York City during the period of the alleged conspiracy, and at least one high-profile meeting alleged by the plaintiffs as an overt act—the Trump Tower meeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya—took place in the city as well. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Annab v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:15 am
Hawaii, the third iteration of Trump’s travel ban issued last September, reports the New York Times. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Factual BackgroundPlaintiff is in her late thirties and an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of New York. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak and Michael Shear report that “[t]he court’s decision not to hear the administration’s appeal was expected, as no appeals court has yet ruled on the issue. [read post]
