Search for: "Andrew Cox v."
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
” See also Cox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Jan. 12, 2011) (national origin discrimination and retaliation claims) Andrews v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am
Probert v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:35 am
Cox, Castle & Nicholson Partner Andrew Sabey argued before the Court on behalf of the California Building and Industry Association. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:54 pm
The decision, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:36 pm
Burning the candle at more than one end and not recreational v. work either, just work of various kinds. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:49 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Andrew Evans v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
Idly fumbling through the electronic annals of Parliament House, the humble case of Daniel Cox v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said afterward that “we will look back on this day, V-Day, as a key moment in the fighback of this terrible disease. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:34 am
The first showed that someone using the screen name `rablechman’ logged on to AOL on December 5, 2008, from a Cox Communications IP address. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Cox and Thomas Lee Hazen. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In the context of congressional oversight, the executive branch has thus largely been, as Cox wrote, “left to itself. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Levy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
While the 2011 Act is of very wide application, it has particular significance for computer crime where it creates both duties to report certain types of crime and new police powers to require the handing over of passwords and decryption of files.Pearse Ryan and Claire O'Brien of Arthur Cox and Andy Harbison of Grant Thornton have produced a very good guide to the effect of the 2011 Act for the Society of Computers and Law (paywalled) and with their kind permission I'm glad to be able to… [read post]
