Search for: "Anthony M Kennedy" Results 41 - 60 of 1,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2015, 10:06 am by Lyle Denniston
Showing some skepticism that an election now taking place in Hawaii is a purely private matter, Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a news release that begins, "Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Judging, on a hugely important constitutional issue, always brings out a deep, brooding contemplation in Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:32 am by Michael Dorf
During the course of over three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am by Lyle Denniston
Ending an era, and almost certainly guaranteeing strong conservative control of the Supreme Court, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:58 am
“People can’t think, ‘I’m Agatha Christie,’ or something like that. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Less than two minutes into the Supreme Court’s new review on Tuesday of the use of race in college admissions, it was clear that Justice Anthony M. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm by Leah Litman
She clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy during the October 2011 term. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
Analysis Speaking only for himself — at least for now, Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
23 Jul 2003, 10:32 am
On July 23, 1936, US Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm
"Kennedy and his new constitutional dilemma": Lyle Denniston has a blog post that begins, "Over the years, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:06 pm
Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:42 pm
And at "Above the Law," David Lat has a post titled "No, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
There's still no split in the circuits, and there probably never will be, and I'm holding to my theory that the Court has decided to decide by not deciding. [read post]