Search for: "Appeal of Pennsylvania Electric Company" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2013, 10:01 am
Efforts by an electric company to appeal a $400,000 mesothelioma liability verdict handed down in 2006 have ultimately been unsuccessful, as the Superior Court in Pennsylvania upheld the original judgment. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:09 am by Jeff O
North Union Township, et al.The municipalities involved in this litigation all file petitions for alllowance of appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Philadelphia Electric Company, wherein the Court granted workers’ comp benefits to an employee who suffered a heart attack at home, after having a great deal of stress at work. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of Oberdorf v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:02 am
The company, headquartered in West Chester, Ohio, also employs people in Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Kentucky. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, No. 12‐2688 (7th Cir. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule that will allow electric utility companies to keep coal ash in unlined pits provided that they meet certain safety criteria and demonstrate that there is not a statistically significant risk of groundwater contamination. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm by WIMS
In this case Petitioners including The Wilderness Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, California Wilderness Coalition, and many more environmental organizations, combined with Petitioner states including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Virginia; with Respondents United States Department of Energy and many Respondents-Intervenors including Allegheny Energy, Inc., American Public Power Association, Edison Electric Institute, Monongahela Power Company, and… [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  However, in its decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that the issue had not been preserved for appeal and that the Superior Court had, therefore, improperly addressed the merits of the question presented.While the Court found that the issue had been waived, several of the Justices wrote Concurring Opinions voicing their thoughts that a trial court judge should remain on the bench during the course of voir dire.9. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
 Because six of the appellee corporations are Pennsylvania-based, Pennsylvania can certainly be viewed as possessing a legitimate interest in ensuring that Pennsylvania companies do not manufacture or distribute hazardous products which cause injury. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am by Gene Killian
  And you can watch the argument in the New York Court of Appeals here. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 am by Gene Killian
  And you can watch the argument in the New York Court of Appeals here. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:39 pm
They said that Pennsylvania’s Eastern District Court made a mistake when it denied the plaintiffs motion to remand. [read post]