Search for: "Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Second, some potential Apple allies have now declared themselves in support of neither party, stopping short of supporting Apple's position in its entirety. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/DqyXd8WZnB -> Apple and Samsung ink deals to enter China's mobile payments by early 2016 https://t.co/TlIE4gLWkB -> What Does BMG v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
In May 2013, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc.[2013] EWCA Civ 451 [on which see Norman Sierbrasse's guest Katpost here] unanimously affirmed Mr Justice Floyd's decision (in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC1789) with respect to the slide-to-unlock patent and held that “all the claims of 022 [Apple’s slide to unlock patent] are obvious in the light of… [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
Microsoft was a third party beneficiary entitled to rely on these contracts (Microsoft Corp. v Motorola, Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
But displaying so much proximity to a party is, as I said, unusual and (in the cases I watch) unprecedented for a group of amici curiae.While the first Apple v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:28 pm by Barry Barnett
If you do not like Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner, you will enjoy the Federal Circuit's slap-down of their colleague in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
At first sight it appeared to be a settlement, which surprised me because I had attended a Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:26 pm
   Procedural HistoryMotorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) [argued before] the International Trade Commission[ that] Apple Inc. [read post]