Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 81 - 100
of 957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
As the dissent pointed out in language applicable to most of the Roberts Court's separation of powers cases:The text of the Constitution allows these common for-cause removal limits. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
It deals with the application of the Colorado Exoneration Act, and its application regarding restitution money that Shannon Nelson paid as a result of her conviction, which was later overturned on appeal. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:00 pm
One thing I want you to do is read the interview I did with Kim Barrett last year. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:19 am
Devlin Barrett, Perry Stein, and Jacqueline Alemany report for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
In so doing, Judge Kethledge relied heavily on an en-banc dissent written by then-Judge Barrett in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Griffin was an applicant in a collateral challenge; he sought to use Section 3 as a sword, that is, offensively as a cause of action supporting affirmative relief, but he could not do so without enforcement legislation. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
[A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen ] Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a new draft article, titled Sweeping and Forcing the President into Section 3: A Response to William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:09 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote on behalf of the majority. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:38 am
” Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored a concurring opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Thanks to Trump’s three Supreme Court appointments—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—the Court lurched to the far right. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
One of the moves in the Brunstein-Goodson piece is downplaying economic and political significance as a factor for the MQD’s application. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 7:15 pm
(Mark Graber, Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman, and myself). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
For voting-rights advocates who strive to maximize participation in state and federal elections, the end of the Supreme Court’s October 2022 term in June brought both relief and cause for concern. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Mills, Justice Barrett has not granted shadow docket relief on any application from any other circuit. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
After all, even Justice Scalia (Justice Barrett's mentor) used to emphasize that textualists attend to context. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
Gorsuch J for the Court (Roberts CJ, and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett JJ concurring) held that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing the appellant, a designer who intended to produce customized and tailored wedding websites, to create expressive designs conveying messages with which she disagrees, such as for for same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
. lose your ability to help to shape what comes next in the application of that rule. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:51 am
Past applications of BSER under section 111 have not been particularly modest and have often been expensive. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Even in the face of a lengthy concurrence by Justice Amy Coney Barrett defending the major questions doctrine as consistent with precepts of textualism—one that seemingly failed to convince any of her colleagues—the most important opinion may have been Justice Kagan’s blistering dissent. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Justice Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan and Barrett, which agreed with the majority on the judgment only. [read post]
