Search for: "Application of Hollingsworth"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 2:08 pm
Jamie Hollingsworth and Chris Young were indicted in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina and charged with conspiracy to make false statements on loan applications. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Hollingsworth v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:32 am
While we don’t believe that the existing language of the Rule (or Supreme Court precedent requiring application of the abuse of discretion standard, or the principle that statutes override prior precedents) is ambiguous, we do think that our proposal would serve to put guilty courts on notice that their consistent evasion of Rule 702’s reliability standard is unacceptable. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:43 am
Second, if not--if "rational basis" review is applicable--what are the state interests supporting denial of same-sex marriage, and do they satisfy even the very deferential “rational-basis” test? [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
The answer was not immediately clear, particularly as the Court issued a ruling the very same day in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
(He may be one-hundred-percent sure about this, if enough of them tipped their hands on this point when they met in their private Conference back in 2013 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:52 pm
The petition in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Usually, the case-or-controversy requirement shows up in appellate review by requiring that the appellant have Article III standing to appeal–the very defect that proved fatal to the Prop. 8 proponents in the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 9:02 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Some day, Hollingsworth or one of the luminaries on that defense team will be able to author an entire hornbook on all of the issues that have cropped up in that litigation. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Georgia, the ensuing litigation, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
But in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
For example, last Term the Hollingsworth case (the federal injunction against California's Prop. 8) was carried over for four conferences before the Court granted review. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In race and gender cases, the Court justified its application of heightened scrutiny initially by examining past discrimination against the class of racial minorities and women. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
This is the fourth post in a series on the “California rule” and constitutional protection of public-sector employee pensions, based on the White Paper I’ve written for the Federalist Society. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Hamlet act III, scene II) of the use of a plain meaning rule of statutory construction in an area where the meaning and application of the statutory framework is anything but clear. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 3:57 pm
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
