Search for: "Application of Horner"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Horner (University of Missouri). [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
” Peelle was angry and accused Horner of poor performance. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Horner J readily agreed that the retention of such information interfered with her rights under Article 8, but dismissed her application on the grounds that the interference was justified. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:03 am
A unique aspect of the Board's opinion is that it provides a ground for invalidity under 35 USC § 112, ¶ 2, that is applicable only in the case of a pending application and not a granted patent. [read post]
BPAI Finds Broadest Reasonable Construction of "Fixed" Includes Both Direct and Indirect Connections
22 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
" The applicants argued that the prior art taught an intermediate structure, not a direct fixation. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:54 am
Horner Chair of Military Theory. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Horner Chair of Military Theory. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:40 am
Horner overruled Colon. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:28 pm
A breathalyzer test allegedly indicated Horner had a BAC that was twice the legal limit. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 2:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) McAdie v Royal Bank of Scotland [2007] EWCA Civ 806 (31 July 2007) IFE Fund SA v Goldman Sachs International [2007] EWCA Civ 811 (31 July 2007) Massey v Unifi [2007] EWCA Civ 800 (31 July 2007) Deadman v Bristol City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 822 (31 July 2007) EB (Ethiopia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 809 (31 July 2007) AG (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 801 (31 July 2007) Somerset County… [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 12:54 pm
Horner, writing on assignment for the Court of Appeal gave more weight to Ramanathan's declaration that he had no employees working under his supervision, had no control over anyone else's employment, was primarily involved in the design and development of software applications, and had nothing to do with banking operations or customer service. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:31 am
Section 112, second paragraph, where the application failed to disclose any algorithms that transformed the disclosed general purpose processor to a special purpose computer programmed to perform the disclosed functions: According to Administrative Patent Judge Horner, . . . we have thoroughly reviewed the Appellants' Specification and have not been able to locate an adequate disclosure of structure, material, or acts corresponding to the… [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:08 am
HORNER, and KEN B. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Herring’s treatment fell below the applicable standard of care. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm
HORNER, WILLIAM F. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:09 am
Considering, in order to respond to applicant’s arguments, other portions of a reference submitted by the applicant. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
In this medical negligence case, the Illinois Appellate Court took an interlocutory appeal on an issue of first impression regarding the application of the Petrillo doctrine on a unique set of facts. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
In this medical negligence case, the Illinois Appellate Court took an interlocutory appeal on an issue of first impression regarding the application of the Petrillo doctrine on a unique set of facts. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
For context, it may be useful to the reader to examine claim 1 of the patent application, which can be found in the BPAI decision itself (link above). [read post]
