Search for: "Application of Myers et al" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Wells Bennett
Gates et al., a damages action brought by a former Guantanamo detainee against former government officers in their individual capacities. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Myers, J. in Arconti et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Myers, et al., on Jan. 11 — five months before the Boumediene ruling came down. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”# # #If you are a victim of discrimination (of any kind), please do not hesitate to reach out to one of our lawyers by calling 212-619-5400.# #To view a copy of the complaint form, click here: MYERS v, NASSAU COUNTY, et al# # #Media coverage about this lawsuit can be found here:Newsday article: https://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/nassau-police-discrimination-lawsuit-v76wlk52Bloomberg article:… [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
For example, Perri et al. recently described in the Canadian Medical Association Journal how there is an increased risk of infection of COVID-19, as well as a higher risk of worse outcomes given the existence of comorbidities. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:57 am
, and other relevant posts.http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/02/more-on-innovation-and-its-discontents.htmlhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/02/innovation-and-its-discontents-foggy-on.html***In the realm of something that likely will NOT be mentioned by Professor Jaffe et al. on 15 Feb. is a discussion of patent grant rates that appears in a thread on Patently-O [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/02/uspto_allowance.html#comments ]. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sec. 102(e), that the Kaplan patent cannot be used to show obviousness under Sec. 103, and that appellants' claim was not obvious from a cited patent to Pruett et al. [read post]
Certainteed Corp., et al., that only one of seven plaintiffs could bring class action claims for alleged defects in the siding of their home in the Northern District because only that one plaintiff lived in New York. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:39 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief in support of Texas from Babylon Bee et al Amicus briefs in support of NetChoice/CCIA preliminary injunction motion Chamber of Progress et al EFF RCFP et al TechFreedom Texas response. [read post]