Search for: "Application of Shanks" Results 41 - 60 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
” – the court has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of “outstanding benefit” in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Master Lock Co., we held that the patent ownerfailed to establish copying despite its argument that “competitors’ copying and marketing of convertible shank hitchpin locks shortly after the invention’s existence becameknown supports a finding of nonobviousness. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
Further comments on Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 | Benelux Court of Justice rules on well-known trade mark in a work of art | Michael Palmedo named Shamnad Basheer IP/Trade Fellow | China introduces new regulation tackling bad faith trade marks… and who is Jing Hanqing? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am by Anthony Fairclough
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by INFORRM
However, during the legal proceedings, the applicant and Mr Shanks reached a settlement. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 6 and Thursday 7 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
ClubsNSW has dropped criminal contempt charges against YouTuber Jordan Shanks over an interview with whistleblower Troy Stolz. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
The '115 patent and '426 patent (collectively, "the sleeve patents") claim a hitch pin lock having a removable sleeve to increase the shank's diameter, and a method for providing a hitch pin lock with a removable sleeve on the shank. '649 went to a seal on a lock, to prevent contamination fouling the lock. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors, heard 6-7 Feb 2019. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:04 pm by News Desk
Both seafood processors are required to document specific steps they will take to correct deviations cited by FDA and to come into compliance with applicable laws and regulations. [read post]