Search for: "Application of Walker" Results 141 - 160 of 1,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  Judge Walker then made a detailed historical survey of the Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit cases discussing the application of the per se rule in the group boycott context. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm by Stephen Page
This is not the case, as the court must separately make a stay order.An example of this was in the recent Family Court case of Cameron and Walker. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 2:59 am
February 10, 2009) (Walker, Calabresi, Katzmann, CJJ) (per curiam)In 1995, Melvin Poindexter was charged with a cocaine conspiracy, with no drug quantity specified in the indictment. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:39 am by Katherine Pompilio
Walker found that the lower court’s interpretation of the obstruction statute was too narrow in its application to only a “document, record, or other object. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:42 am
The analysis requires a close look at the circumstances of the accident, the applicable laws, and occasionally the assistance of an accident reconstruction expert. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:27 am
" For example, Jack Daniel's, Godiva, Johnnie Walker, Baileys, and Captain Morgan offer liquor and candy. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:36 am by Alfred Brophy
  Applications should be submitted electronically to the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Danielle Holley-Walker (holleydr@law.sc.edu). [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 5:42 pm
Many of Applicant's [other] claims could also be rejected using the same reference. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 2:52 pm by Steve Statsinger
August 12, 2010) (Walker, Sacks, Livingston, CJJ)Sanjay Kumar and Stephen Richards, officers as a company called Computer Associates, engineered a huge accounting fraud that ended in October of 2000. [read post]
It’s undisputed that Walker fired first, although there may be some question about whether the bullet that struck Mattingly came from Walker’s gun or from Hankison’s. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]