Search for: "Applications in Internet Time, LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 3:35 am
Abita Brewing Company, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:47 am
Valuewalk, LLC, 2018 WL 5831311 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:01 pm
Vanguard Trademark Holdings USA LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:22 am
Inc LLC and Trkulja v Google Inc LLC (No 5). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:54 am
As to the Wikipedia entry, that would have been acceptable had applicant offered it into the record at a time when the other party had an opportunity to rebut the evidence. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Rather, Belardi-Ostroy takes issue with ALC’s business strategy which, in Belardi-Ostroy’s view, should be more internet driven. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
Rather, Belardi-Ostroy takes issue with ALC’s business strategy which, in Belardi-Ostroy’s view, should be more internet driven. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
In response, one of the co-owners confirmed that the belated incorporation was due to an “oversight,” but they intended to create the entity at the same time the application was filed. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
Analytics App – Created By Inblosam LLC, Available for USD $6.99 The Analytics Application can be found in the Productivity Category. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 9:12 am
In re Home Dynamix, LLC, Serial No. 87116576 (December 21, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
Aereo – Copyright Act application to streaming of free broadcast TV programs via the Internet to paying customers (Justice Alito is recused) Wednesday, April 23: United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 3:06 am
Kudo, Inc. dba Kudo Technologies, Opposition No. 91240097 [Opposition to registration of KUDO for downloadable software and SAAS for enabling online conferencing in multiple languages, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark KUDOS for, inter alia, Internet-based social networking services, and on the ground of nonuse as of the filing date of the underlying application for the class 9 goods.] [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 9:06 am
RPX filed an inter partes review petition arguing that claims of the ’599 patent were obvious at the time of the application. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Louis (and, interestingly, is a Washington LLC). [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:32 pm
Cir. 2017) (concluding claims were directed to an abstract idea because theclaimed “activity, i.e., organizing and accessing recordsthrough the creation of an index-searchable database, includes longstanding conduct that existed well before theadvent of computers and the Internet”); Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:19 am
The asserted claims were directed to (i) the secure management of patient records, (ii) financial transaction alerts, and (iii) internet marketing via “match engine. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:11 pm
Faced with far-reaching claims by an ambitious applicant, but little time to scrutinize them, examiners don’t have many options—especially since applicants can return again and again. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
Urbach was applicable. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
Urbach was applicable. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:56 am
These materials do not communicate, as “puffery” or otherwise, that Applicant’s menu items involving grains are “prepared from the Applicant’s new or ‘original’ recipes for grains,” id., or are otherwise the “earliest” or the “first in time,” or new or unique to Applicant. [read post]
