Search for: "Aristocrat Technologies Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 8:48 pm by Mark Summerfield
Over the past five years (i.e. since 2019) Korea’s LG Electronics Inc and China’s Huawei Technologies Ltd have consistently placed in the top five applicants for Australian patents. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 9:16 pm by Mark Summerfield
Other major filers of recent years to have dropped out of the top 30 include cloud computing and virtualization technology provider Citrix Systems, Inc (sixth placed in 2021 with 147 applications, down to just 19 filings in 2022) and semiconductor and wireless technology company Qualcomm Inc (which peaked at 326 applications in 2018, but filed just 28 times in 2022). [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
  [7] D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc (2015) 258 CLR 334 (Myriad) at 342-343 [12], 385-388 [138]-[145]. [8] Aristocrat Technologies at [77]. [9] Ibid at [77]. [10] Ibid. [11] N V Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 655. [12] Aristocrat Technologies at [77]. [13] Ibid at [101] – [102]. [14] Ibid at [122]. [15] Ibid. [16] Ibid at [153]. [17] Ibid at [84]. [18] Ibid at [79]. [19] Ibid at [76]. [20] Ibid… [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:07 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
  [7] D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc (2015) 258 CLR 334 (Myriad) at 342-343 [12], 385-388 [138]-[145]. [8] Aristocrat Technologies at [77]. [9] Ibid at [77]. [10] Ibid. [11] N V Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 655. [12] Aristocrat Technologies at [77]. [13] Ibid at [101] – [102]. [14] Ibid at [122]. [15] Ibid. [16] Ibid at [153]. [17] Ibid at [84]. [18] Ibid at [79]. [19] Ibid at [76]. [20] Ibid… [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 5:13 pm by Mark Summerfield
The leading Australian resident patent recipients were the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), with 48 patents (coincidentally, the same as the number of new standard patent applications it filed in 2021) and Aristocrat Technologies, with 47 patents, placing them 23rd and 24th respectively. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:37 pm by Mark Summerfield
The top Australian resident applicant, once again, was electronic gaming system developer Aristocrat Technologies. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:46 pm by Mark Summerfield
  On this measure, Australia’s biggest filer, Aristocrat Technologies, drops from fourth place, with a total of 238 standard patent applications, to eleventh place, with just 96 of those applications being ‘original’ rather than divisional. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-07-06 https://t.co/eOHNji7tfp 2019-07-07 Misuse of private information and copyright infringement found Bull vDesporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) (26 June 2019) https://t.co/Fr6C76W9AM 2019-07-07 Major accounting of profit award against game cheats company Blizzard Entertainment v Bossland [2019] EWHC 1665 (… https://t.co/j3iLYIvLkf 2019-07-07 Amazon found liable as seller for product liability claim https://t.co/Jv7eZlDumr 2019-07-07… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In 2017, UFRF sued General Electric Company, GE Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc., and GE Medical Systems, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:00 pm by John Collins
John Collins and Sumer DayalClayton Utz On 22 July 2016, IP Australia approved a patent specification involving computer programming in poker machines in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited [2016] APO 49. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:57 pm by Mark Summerfield
  By contrast, in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited [2016] APO 49, which was decided on 22 July 2016, Hearing Officer S D Barker found that claims directed, in substance, to an improvement in a user interface were directed to patent-eligible subject matter, notwithstanding that this also required only ‘generic computer implementation’ on an otherwise conventional gaming machine. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
  Procedural HistoryThe challengers are Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC; Exela Pharmsci, Inc.; and Exela Holdings, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The challengers are Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC; Exela Pharmsci, Inc.; and Exela Holdings, Inc. [read post]